Towards a resolution of the proton form factor problem: new electron and positron scattering data
D. Adikaram, D. Rimal, L.B. Weinstein, B. Raue, P. Khetarpal, R.P., Bennett, J. Arrington, W.K. Brooks, K.P. Adhikari, A.V. Afanasev, M.J., Amaryan, M.D. Anderson, J. Ball, M. Battaglieri, I. Bedlinskiy, A.S. Biselli,, J. Bono, S. Boiarinov, W.J. Briscoe, V.D. Burkert

TL;DR
This study measures the ratio of positron-proton to electron-proton scattering to quantify two-photon exchange effects, aiming to resolve discrepancies in proton form factor measurements and improve understanding of proton structure.
Contribution
It introduces a novel simultaneous measurement technique of positron and electron scattering to directly determine two-photon exchange contributions affecting proton form factor extraction.
Findings
Cross section ratio increases with decreasing virtual photon polarization at Q^2=1.45 GeV^2
Results align with hadronic calculations including nucleon and Δ intermediate states
Measurement supports the role of two-photon exchange in resolving form factor discrepancies
Abstract
There is a significant discrepancy between the values of the proton electric form factor, , extracted using unpolarized and polarized electron scattering. Calculations predict that small two-photon exchange (TPE) contributions can significantly affect the extraction of from the unpolarized electron-proton cross sections. We determined the TPE contribution by measuring the ratio of positron-proton to electron-proton elastic scattering cross sections using a simultaneous, tertiary electron-positron beam incident on a liquid hydrogen target and detecting the scattered particles in the Jefferson Lab CLAS detector. This novel technique allowed us to cover a wide range in virtual photon polarization () and momentum transfer () simultaneously, as well as to cancel luminosity-related systematic errors. The cross section ratio increases with decreasing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
