Selection biases in the gamma ray burst E$_{\rm iso}$ -- L$_{\rm opt,X}$ correlation
David Coward, Eric Howell, Linfeng Wan, Damien Macpherson

TL;DR
This study reveals that selection biases significantly affect the observed correlation between gamma-ray burst energies and afterglow luminosities, and after correction, the correlation is not statistically significant for long GRBs.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that selection effects dominate the observed E$_{ m iso}$ -- L$_{ m opt,X}$ correlation in GRB afterglow data and provides a corrected analysis showing the true nature of this relationship.
Findings
Selection biases are strong in optical and X-ray afterglow data.
Correcting for biases weakens the E$_{ m iso}$ -- L$_{ m opt,X}$ correlation for long GRBs.
Tentative evidence suggests higher magnetic energy fractions in short GRBs.
Abstract
Gamma ray burst (GRB) optical and X-ray afterglow luminosity is expected to correlate with the GRB isotropic equivalent kinetic energy of the outflow in the standard synchrotron model for GRB afterglows. Previous studies, using prompt GRB isotropic equivalent energy () as a proxy for isotropic equivalent kinetic energy, have generally confirmed a correlation between X-ray and optical afterglow luminosities. Assuming that GRB afterglow luminosity does not evolve strongly with redshift, we identify a strong Malmquist bias in GRB optical and X-ray afterglow luminosity data. We show that selection effects dominate the observed E -- L correlations, and have likely been underestimated in other studies. The bias is strongest for a subset of optically faint bursts at 24 hr with . After removing this optical selection bias, the E --…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
