Communicative Competence for Individuals who require Augmentative and Alternative Communication: A New Definition for a New Era of Communication?
Janice Light, David McNaughton

TL;DR
This paper reviews the evolution of the concept of communicative competence for AAC users over 25 years, assessing its relevance amidst significant advancements in the field.
Contribution
It revisits and evaluates the original definition of communicative competence in light of recent developments in AAC technology and practices.
Findings
Original definition remains relevant but needs updating.
Psychosocial factors are increasingly recognized as crucial.
Environmental barriers and supports significantly influence competence.
Abstract
In 1989, Light defined communicative competence for individuals with complex communication needs who require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) as a dynamic, interpersonal construct based on functionality of communication, adequacy of communication, and sufficiency of knowledge, judgment, and skills. Specifically, Light argued that in order to demonstrate communicative competence, individuals who required AAC had to develop and integrate knowledge, judgment, and skills in four interrelated domains: linguistic, operational, social, and strategic. In 2003, Light expanded this definition and argued that the attainment of communicative competence is influenced not just by linguistic, operational, social, and strategic competencies, but also by a variety of psychosocial factors (e.g., motivation, attitude, confidence, resilience) as well as by barriers and supports in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
