Efficient protocols for unidirectional and bidirectional controlled deterministic secure quantum communication: Different alternative approaches
Anirban Pathak

TL;DR
This paper introduces more efficient protocols for controlled deterministic secure quantum communication using permutation of particles, requiring only bipartite entanglement, and demonstrates multiple alternative approaches including orthogonal-state-based protocols.
Contribution
The authors propose a new, more efficient protocol based on permutation of particles and generalize it to bidirectional communication, reducing entanglement requirements and expanding protocol options.
Findings
The new protocol is more efficient than the HH protocol.
Bipartite entanglement suffices for the proposed protocols.
Multiple alternative protocols can be constructed using various approaches.
Abstract
Recently, Hassanpour and Houshmand have proposed a protocol of controlled deterministic secure quantum communication (Quant. Info. Process, DOI 10.1007/s11128-014-0866-z (2014)). The authors compared the efficiency of their protocol with that of two other existing protocols and claimed that their protocol is efficient. Here, we have shown that the efficiency of Hassanpour Houshmand (HH) protocol is not high, and there exist several approaches through which more efficient protocols for the same task can be designed. To establish this point, we have proposed an efficient protocol of controlled deterministic secure quantum communication which is based on permutation of particles (PoP) technique and is considerably efficient compared to HH protocol. We have also generalized this protocol into its bidirectional counterpart. Interestingly, bipartite entanglement (Bell state) is sufficient for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
