The Complexity of Genetic Diversity
Ruta Mehta, Ioannis Panageas, Georgios Piliouras, Sadra, Yazdanbod

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that predicting the long-term genetic diversity in simple diploid models is computationally intractable, despite classic results suggesting diversity persistence under certain conditions.
Contribution
It establishes complexity theoretic hardness results for predicting genetic diversity in diploid models, linking biology with complexity theory and game dynamics.
Findings
Predicting diversity survival is computationally hard.
Diversity persists with high probability under random fitness landscapes.
Results are robust across various model parameters and definitions.
Abstract
A key question in biological systems is whether genetic diversity persists in the long run under evolutionary competition or whether a single dominant genotype emerges. Classic work by Kalmus in 1945 has established that even in simple diploid species (species with two chromosomes) diversity can be guaranteed as long as the heterozygote individuals enjoy a selective advantage. Despite the classic nature of the problem, as we move towards increasingly polymorphic traits (e.g. human blood types) predicting diversity and understanding its implications is still not fully understood. Our key contribution is to establish complexity theoretic hardness results implying that even in the textbook case of single locus diploid models predicting whether diversity survives or not given its fitness landscape is algorithmically intractable. We complement our results by establishing that under randomly…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEvolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation · Evolution and Genetic Dynamics · Game Theory and Applications
