Physical and Morphological Properties of [O II] Emitting Galaxies in the HETDEX Pilot Survey
Joanna S. Bridge, Caryl Gronwall, Robin Ciardullo, Alex Hagen, Greg, Zeimann, A. I. Malz, Viviana Acquaviva, Donald P. Schneider, Niv Drory, Karl, Gebhardt, Shardha Jogee

TL;DR
This study analyzes the properties of [O II] emitting galaxies from the HETDEX pilot survey, revealing their star formation behaviors, metallicity effects, and morphological characteristics across a range of redshifts.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the star formation rates, metallicity dependence, and morphology of [O II] emitters at intermediate redshifts, bridging local and high-redshift galaxy studies.
Findings
[O II] emitters follow the star-forming main sequence.
Mass-specific SFR is higher in lower mass galaxies.
Star formation is not driven by mergers or size evolution.
Abstract
The Hobby-Eberly Dark Energy Experiment pilot survey identified 284 [O II] 3727 emitting galaxies in a 169 square-arcminute field of sky in the redshift range 0 < z < 0.57. This line flux limited sample provides a bridge between studies in the local universe and higher-redshift [O II] surveys. We present an analysis of the star formation rates (SFRs) of these galaxies as a function of stellar mass as determined via spectral energy distribution fitting. The [O II] emitters fall on the "main sequence" of star-forming galaxies with SFR decreasing at lower masses and redshifts. However, the slope of our relation is flatter than that found for most other samples, a result of the metallicity dependence of the [O II] star formation rate indicator. The mass specific SFR is higher for lower mass objects, supporting the idea that massive galaxies formed more quickly and efficiently than their…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
