Cosmological Tests Using the Angular Size of Galaxy Clusters

TL;DR

This study compares the standard LCDM model and the R_h=ct universe using galaxy cluster angular size data, finding that both fit well but the R_h=ct model is statistically favored due to fewer parameters, impacting galaxy growth theories.

Contribution

It provides a direct comparison of two cosmological models using galaxy cluster sizes, favoring the simpler R_h=ct universe based on statistical criteria.

Findings

Both models fit the data well based on chi-squared values.

Bayes Information Criterion favors R_h=ct with ~86% likelihood.

Results suggest galaxy growth issues may be due to cosmological assumptions.

Abstract

We use measurements of the galaxy-cluster angular size versus redshift to test and compare the standard model (LCDM) and the R_h=ct Universe. We show that the latter fits the data with a reduced chi^2_dof=0.786 for a Hubble constant H_0= 72.6 (-3.4+3.8) km/s/Mpc, and H_0 is the sole parameter in this model. By comparison, the optimal flat LCDM model, with two free parameters (including Omega_m=0.50 and H_0=73.9 (-9.5+10.6) km/s/Mpc), fits the angular-size data with a reduced chi^2_dof=0.806. On the basis of their chi^2_dof values alone, both models appear to account for the data very well in spite of the fact that the R_h=ct Universe expands at a constant rate, while LCDM does not. However, because of the different number of free parameters in these models, selection tools, such as the Bayes Information Criterion, favour R_h=ct over LCDM with a likelihood of ~86% versus ~14%. These results impact the question of galaxy growth at large redshifts. Previous work suggested an inconsistency with the underlying cosmological model unless elliptical and disk galaxies grew in size by a surprisingly large factor ~6 from z~3 to 0. The fact that both LCDM and R_h=ct fit the cluster-size measurements quite well casts some doubt on the suggestion that the unexpected result with individual galaxies may be due to the use of an incorrect expansion scenario, rather than astrophysical causes, such as mergers and/or selection effects.