Essential equivalence of the GENERIC and Steepest Entropy Ascent models of dissipation for non-equilibrium thermodynamics
Alberto Montefusco, Francesco Consonni, and Gian Paolo Beretta

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates the fundamental equivalence between the GENERIC and Steepest Entropy Ascent models in non-equilibrium thermodynamics by reformulating them in differential geometric terms and comparing their structures.
Contribution
It provides a formal proof that, under certain conditions, GENERIC and SEA models are interchangeable in describing dissipation in thermodynamics.
Findings
Reformulation of SEA using differential geometry.
Comparison of GENERIC and SEA structures.
Proof of equivalence under conservation law degeneracies.
Abstract
By reformulating the Steepest-Entropy-Ascent (SEA) dynamical model for non-equilibrium thermodynamics in the mathematical language of Differential Geometry, we compare it with the primitive formulation of the GENERIC model and discuss the main technical differences of the two approaches. In both dynamical models the description of dissipation is of the "entropy-gradient" type. SEA focuses only onto the irreversible component of the time evolution, chooses a sub-Riemannian metric tensor as dissipative structure, and uses the local entropy density field as potential. GENERIC emphasizes the coupling between the reversible and irreversible components of the time evolution, chooses two compatible degenerate structures (Poisson and degenerate co-Riemannian), and uses the global energy and entropy functionals as potentials. As an illustration, we rewrite the known GENERIC formulation of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
