The classical Kepler problem and geodesic motion on spaces of constant curvature
Aidan J. Keane, Richard K. Barrett, John F.L. Simmons

TL;DR
This paper establishes a unified Hamiltonian framework linking the classical Kepler problem with geodesic motion on spaces of constant curvature, revealing deep geometric and algebraic correspondences between the two systems.
Contribution
It generalizes previous work by providing a canonical transformation that relates Kepler dynamics to geodesic motion on curved spaces, unifying their constants of motion and symmetries.
Findings
The Hamiltonian vector fields are related via a canonical transformation.
The Runge-Lenz vector emerges from space isometries.
Constants of motion share the same Poisson algebra structure.
Abstract
In this paper we clarify and generalise previous work by Moser and Belbruno concerning the link between the motions in the classical Kepler problem and geodesic motion on spaces of constant curvature. Both problems can be formulated as Hamiltonian systems and the phase flow in each system is characterised by the value of the corresponding Hamiltonian and one other parameter (the mass parameter in the Kepler problem and the curvature parameter in the geodesic motion problem). Using a canonical transformation the Hamiltonian vector field for the geodesic motion problem is transformed into one which is proportional to that for the Kepler problem. Within this framework the energy of the Kepler problem is equal to (minus) the curvature parameter of the constant curvature space and the mass parameter is given by the value of the Hamiltonian for the geodesic motion problem. We work with the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
