Another proof of undecidability for the correspondence decision problem - Had I been Emil Post
Vesa Halava

TL;DR
This paper provides a new, simpler proof of the undecidability of the Post Correspondence Problem by following Post's original reduction from Post Normal Systems, offering clearer insights into its computational limits.
Contribution
It introduces a more straightforward proof of undecidability for the Post Correspondence Problem using the same reduction source as Post's original work.
Findings
Confirmed the undecidability of the Post Correspondence Problem
Presented a simplified proof approach
Reinforced the foundational understanding of computational undecidability
Abstract
In 1946 Emil Leon Post (Bulletin of Amer. Math. Soc. 52 (1946), 264 - 268) defined a famous correspondence decision problem which is nowadays called the Post Correspondence Problem, and he proved that the problem is undecidable. In this article we follow the steps of Post, and give another, simpler and more straightforward proof of the undecidability of the problem using the same source of reduction as Post original did, namely, the Post Normal Systems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Advanced Algebra and Logic
