Testing Magnetic Field Models for the Class 0 Protostar L1527
J. A. Davidson, Z.-Y. Li, C. L. H. Hull, R. L. Plambeck, W. Kwon, R., M. Crutcher, L. W. Looney, G. Novak, N. L. Chapman, B. C. Matthews, I. W., Stephens, J. J. Tobin, and T. J. Jones

TL;DR
This study compares polarization observations of the protostar L1527 with four ideal-MHD collapse models to determine which best matches the magnetic field structure, revealing limitations of non-turbulent models in explaining observed features.
Contribution
It evaluates the agreement between observed polarization vectors and four different ideal-MHD collapse models, highlighting the importance of large-area polarization measurements.
Findings
Weak aligned model best matches observed magnetic field structure.
Weak orthogonal model produces the observed circumstellar disk.
Non-turbulent ideal-MHD models may not fully explain L1527's collapse.
Abstract
For the Class 0 protostar, L1527, we compare 131 polarization vectors from SCUPOL/JCMT, SHARP/CSO and TADPOL/CARMA observations with the corresponding model polarization vectors of four ideal-MHD, non-turbulent, cloud core collapse models. These four models differ by their initial magnetic fields before collapse; two initially have aligned fields (strong and weak) and two initially have orthogonal fields (strong and weak) with respect to the rotation axis of the L1527 core. Only the initial weak orthogonal field model produces the observed circumstellar disk within L1527. This is a characteristic of nearly all ideal-MHD, non-turbulent, core collapse models. In this paper we test whether this weak orthogonal model also has the best agreement between its magnetic field structure and that inferred from the polarimetry observations of L1527. We found that this is not the case; based on the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
