General three-state model with biased population replacement: Analytical solution and application to language dynamics

TL;DR

This paper presents an analytical solution to a three-state model of language dynamics, explaining the discontinuous irregularity pattern of English verbs based on population replacement and agent interactions.

Contribution

It introduces and solves a general three-state model that captures the discontinuous transition in language irregularity, extending previous two-state models and aligning with empirical data.

Findings

Discontinuous transition in verb irregularity frequency explained

Three-state model captures empirical irregularity patterns

Interaction rules like Naming Game lead to discontinuous behavior

Abstract

Empirical evidence shows that the rate of irregular usage of English verbs exhibits discontinuity as a function of their frequency: the most frequent verbs tend to be totally irregular. We aim to qualitatively understand the origin of this feature by studying simple agent--based models of language dynamics, where each agent adopts an inflectional state for a verb and may change it upon interaction with other agents. At the same time, agents are replaced at some rate by new agents adopting the regular form. In models with only two inflectional states (regular and irregular), we observe that either all verbs regularize irrespective of their frequency, or a continuous transition occurs between a low frequency state where the lemma becomes fully regular, and a high frequency one where both forms coexist. Introducing a third (mixed) state, wherein agents may use either form, we find that a third, qualitatively different behavior may emerge, namely, a discontinuous transition in frequency. We introduce and solve analytically a very general class of three--state models that allows us to fully understand these behaviors in a unified framework. Realistic sets of interaction rules, including the well-known Naming Game (NG) model, result in a discontinuous transition, in agreement with recent empirical findings. We also point out that the distinction between speaker and hearer in the interaction has no effect on the collective behavior. The results for the general three--state model, although discussed in terms of language dynamics, are widely applicable.