Requirements for a loophole-free photonic Bell test using imperfect setting generators
Johannes Kofler, Marissa Giustina, Jan-{\AA}ke Larsson, and Morgan W., Mitchell

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the requirements for conducting a loophole-free photonic Bell test, addressing multiple loopholes and the impact of imperfect random number generators on the test's validity.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of closing all major loopholes in photonic Bell tests and adapts statistical methods for imperfect setting generators.
Findings
Identifies conditions to close all loopholes simultaneously.
Proposes modifications to Bell inequalities for imperfect randomness.
Provides statistical analysis framework for realistic experimental setups.
Abstract
Experimental violations of Bell inequalities are in general vulnerable to so-called "loopholes." In this work, we analyse the characteristics of a loophole-free Bell test with photons, closing simultaneously the locality, freedom-of-choice, fair-sampling (i.e. detection), coincidence-time, and memory loopholes. We pay special attention to the effect of excess predictability in the setting choices due to non-ideal random number generators. We discuss necessary adaptations of the CH/Eberhard inequality when using such imperfect devices and -- using Hoeffding's inequality and Doob's optional stopping theorem -- the statistical analysis in such Bell tests.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
