A survey of the ESR model for an objective reinterpretation of quantum mechanics

TL;DR

This survey reviews the ESR model, an objective reinterpretation of quantum mechanics that embeds QM into a broader formalism, addressing foundational issues like nonobjectivity and contextuality.

Contribution

It systematically analyzes the ESR model, highlighting its ability to recover QM formalism, provide a noncontextual hidden variables interpretation, and resolve key foundational problems.

Findings

ESR model recovers standard QM formalism

Provides a noncontextual hidden variables theory

Offers modified Bell's inequalities compatible with QM

Abstract

Most scholars concerned with the foundations of quantum mechanics (QM) think that contextuality and nonlocality (hence nonobjectivity of physical properties) are unavoidable features of QM which follow from the mathematical apparatus of QM. Moreover these features are usually considered as basic in quantum information processing. Nevertheless they raise still unsolved problems, as the objectification problem in the quantum theory of measurement. The extended semantic realism (ESR) model offers a possible way out from these difficulties by embedding the mathematical formalism of QM into a broader mathematical formalism and reinterpreting quantum probabilities as conditional on detection rather than absolute. The embedding allows to recover the formal apparatus of QM within the ESR model, and the reinterpretation of QM allows to construct a noncontextual hidden variables theory which justifies the assumptions introduced in the ESR model and proves its objectivity. According to the ESR model both linear and nonlinear time evolution occur, depending on the physical environment, as in QM. In addition, the ESR model, though objective, implies modified Bell's inequalities that do not conflict with QM, supplies different mathematical representations of proper and improper mixtures, provides a general framework in which the local interpretations of the GHZ experiment obtained by other authors are recovered and explained, and supports an interpretation of quantum logic which avoids the introduction of the problematic notion of quantum truth.