Fundamental limits in heat assisted magnetic recording and methods to overcome it with exchange spring structures
Dieter Suess, Christoph Vogler, Claas Abert, Florian Bruckner, Roman, Windl, Leoni Breth

TL;DR
This paper investigates the fundamental limits of heat assisted magnetic recording, highlighting the trade-offs between writing errors and thermal jitter, and explores composite exchange spring structures and phase transition methods to mitigate these issues.
Contribution
It introduces novel composite structures with high Curie layers and phase transition techniques to reduce errors and jitter in heat assisted magnetic recording.
Findings
FePt elements show significant writing errors at small sizes.
Increasing film thickness reduces errors but does not eliminate jitter.
Composite structures with high damping layers can lower writing errors below 10^-4.
Abstract
The switching probability of magnetic elements for heat assisted recording is investigated. It is found that FePt elements with a diameter of 5 nm and a height of 10nm show, at a field of 0.5 T, thermally written in errors of 12 percent, which is significant too large for bit patterned magnetic recording. Thermally written in errors can be decreased if larger head fields are applied. However, larger fields lead to an increase the fundamental thermal jitter. This leads to a dilemma between thermally written in errors and fundamental thermal jitter. This dilemma can be partly relaxed by increasing the thickness of the FePt film up to 30nm. For realistic head fields, it is found that the fundamental thermal jitter is in the same order of magnitude of the fundamental thermal jitter in conventional recording, which is about 0.5 to 0.8 nm. Composite structures consisting of high Curie top…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
