Primordial mass segregation in simulations of star formation?

TL;DR

This study uses combined SPH and N-body simulations to investigate how feedback mechanisms influence primordial mass segregation in star-forming regions, highlighting the importance of definitions and feedback effects.

Contribution

It provides a detailed comparison of feedback effects on mass segregation and emphasizes the variability based on measurement methods and feedback inclusion.

Findings

Feedback prevents runaway growth of massive stars.

Star-forming regions are less dense with feedback.

Primordial mass segregation is less common with feedback.

Abstract

We take the end result of smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) simulations of star formation which include feedback from photoionisation and stellar winds and evolve them for a further 10Myr using $N$-body simulations. We compare the evolution of each simulation to a control run without feedback, and to a run with photoionisation feedback only. In common with previous work, we find that the presence of feedback prevents the runaway growth of massive stars, and the resulting star-forming regions are less dense, and preserve their initial substructure for longer. The addition of stellar winds to the feedback produces only marginal differences compared to the simulations with just photoionisation feedback. We search for mass segregation at different stages in the simulations; before feedback is switched on in the SPH runs, at the end of the SPH runs (before $N$-body integration) and during the $N$-body evolution. Whether a simulation is primordially mass segregated (i.e. before dynamical evolution) depends extensively on how mass segregation is defined, and different methods for measuring mass segregation give apparently contradictory results. Primordial mass segregation is also less common in the simulations when star formation occurs under the influence of feedback. Further dynamical mass segregation can also take place during the subsequent (gas-free) dynamical evolution. Taken together, our results suggest that extreme caution should be exercised when interpreting the spatial distribution of massive stars relative to low-mass stars in simulations.