On the equivalence of LIST and DIIS methods for convergence acceleration
Alejandro J. Garza, Gustavo E. Scuseria

TL;DR
This paper proves that LIST methods and Pulay's DIIS are mathematically equivalent for convergence acceleration in quantum chemistry, clarifying their relationship and explaining performance differences.
Contribution
It establishes the mathematical equivalence between LIST and DIIS methods, providing insight into their performance variations.
Findings
LIST and DIIS are mathematically equivalent.
Differences in performance are due to implementation details.
Clarifies the theoretical relationship between two convergence acceleration methods.
Abstract
Self-consistent field extrapolation methods play a pivotal role in quantum chemistry and electronic structure theory. We here demonstrate the mathematical equivalence between the recently proposed family of LIST methods [J. Chem. Phys. 134, 241103 (2011); J. Chem. Theory Comput. 7, 3045 (2011)] with Pulay's DIIS [Chem. Phys. Lett. 73, 393 (1980)]. Our results also explain the differences in performance among the various LIST methods.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
