Exploiting Parallelism for Hard Problems in Abstract Argumentation: Technical Report
Federico Cerutti, Ilias Tachmazidis, Mauro Vallati, Sotirios Batsakis,, Massimiliano Giacomin, Grigoris Antoniou

TL;DR
This paper introduces a parallel algorithm for enumerating preferred extensions in abstract argumentation frameworks, significantly improving performance on large frameworks by leveraging SCC-recursive semantics.
Contribution
It presents a novel parallel algorithm for enumeration in abstract argumentation, utilizing SCC-recursive semantics to enhance efficiency.
Findings
Significant speedup in large frameworks
Increased number of solutions found
Effective utilization of parallel computation
Abstract
Abstract argumentation framework (\AFname) is a unifying framework able to encompass a variety of nonmonotonic reasoning approaches, logic programming and computational argumentation. Yet, efficient approaches for most of the decision and enumeration problems associated to \AFname s are missing, thus potentially limiting the efficacy of argumentation-based approaches in real domains. In this paper, we present an algorithm for enumerating the preferred extensions of abstract argumentation frameworks which exploits parallel computation. To this purpose, the SCC-recursive semantics definition schema is adopted, where extensions are defined at the level of specific sub-frameworks. The algorithm shows significant performance improvements in large frameworks, in terms of number of solutions found and speedup.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMulti-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Formal Methods in Verification
