Effects of fast atoms and energy-dependent secondary electron emission yields in PIC/MCC simulations of capacitively coupled plasmas
A. Derzsi, I. Korolov, E. Schuengel, Z. Donko, J. Schulze

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that including fast neutrals and energy-dependent secondary electron emission yields in PIC/MCC simulations significantly impacts plasma density, sheath width, and simulation stability, leading to more realistic modeling of capacitively coupled plasmas.
Contribution
It introduces the importance of incorporating realistic energy-dependent secondary electron emission and fast neutrals in PIC/MCC simulations of CCPs, challenging common simplifications.
Findings
Including fast neutrals increases plasma density and ion flux.
Energy-dependent secondary electron emission affects sheath width.
Simulations diverge at high pressures without these processes.
Abstract
In most PIC/MCC simulations of radio frequency capacitively coupled plasmas (CCPs) several simplifications are made: (i) fast neutrals are not traced, (ii) heavy particle induced excitation and ionization are neglected, (iii) secondary electron emission from boundary surfaces due to neutral particle impact is not taken into account, and (iv) the secondary electron emission coefficient is assumed to be constant, i.e. independent of the incident particle energy and the surface conditions. Here we question the validity of these simplifications under conditions typical for plasma processing applications. We study the effects of including fast neutrals and using realistic energy-dependent secondary electron emission coefficients for ions and fast neutrals in simulations of CCPs operated in argon at 13.56 MHz and at neutral gas pressures between 3 Pa and 100 Pa. We find a strong increase of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
