Pseudogap in cuprates driven by d-wave flux-phase order proximity effects: A theoretical analysis from Raman and ARPES experiments
Andres Greco, Matias Bejas

TL;DR
This paper presents a theoretical analysis explaining the pseudogap phase in high-$T_c$ cuprates as driven by proximity to a d-wave flux-phase order, reconciling experimental observations from Raman and ARPES studies.
Contribution
It introduces a model based on the $t$-$J$ framework that accounts for the nodal-antinodal dichotomy and the pseudogap phenomena through self-energy effects near a d-wave flux-phase instability.
Findings
The pseudogap has a crossover origin involving two competing phases.
Raman and ARPES data can be unified within the flux-phase proximity scenario.
The study explains the depletion in the B$_{2g}$ mode as related to the pseudogap.
Abstract
One of the puzzling characteristics of the pseudogap phase of high- cuprates is the nodal-antinodal dichotomy. While the nodal quasiparticles have a Fermi liquid behaviour, the antinodal ones show non-Fermi liquid features and an associated pseudogap. Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy and electronic Raman scattering are two valuable tools which have shown universal features which are rather material-independent, and presumably intrinsic to the pseudogap phase. The doping and temperature dependence of the Fermi arcs and the pseudogap observed by photoemission near the antinode correlates with the non-Fermi liquid behaviour observed by Raman for the B mode. In contrast, and similar to the nodal quasiparticles detected by photoemission, the Raman B mode shows Fermi liquid features. We show that these two experiments can be analysed, in the context of the -…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
