Causal Inference with a Graphical Hierarchy of Interventions
Ilya Shpitser, Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen

TL;DR
This paper introduces a unifying framework for causal inference using a hierarchy of interventions, linking different causal models and simplifying the identification of complex causal effects.
Contribution
It provides a unified identification theory for a broad class of causal effects through a hierarchy of interventions, connecting existing models via the extended g-formula and edge g-formula.
Findings
Identification reduces to a hierarchy-based analysis of interventions.
The extended g-formula relates to the FFRCISTG model.
The edge g-formula applies to mediation and unobserved confounding scenarios.
Abstract
Identifying causal parameters from observational data is fraught with subtleties due to the issues of selection bias and confounding. In addition, more complex questions of interest, such as effects of treatment on the treated and mediated effects may not always be identified even in data where treatment assignment is known and under investigator control, or may be identified under one causal model but not another. Increasingly complex effects of interest, coupled with a diversity of causal models in use resulted in a fragmented view of identification. This fragmentation makes it unnecessarily difficult to determine if a given parameter is identified (and in what model), and what assumptions must hold for this to be the case. This, in turn, complicates the development of estimation theory and sensitivity analysis procedures. In this paper, we give a unifying view of a large class of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
