Pulsar Timing Errors from Asynchronous Multi-Frequency Sampling of Dispersion Measure Variations
M. T. Lam, J. M. Cordes, S. Chatterjee, T. Dolch

TL;DR
This paper investigates how non-simultaneous multi-frequency observations affect pulsar timing accuracy due to dispersion measure variations, providing guidelines for data collection to achieve nanosecond precision.
Contribution
It quantifies the impact of asynchronous sampling on timing errors and offers prescriptions for observation timing to improve pulsar timing precision.
Findings
Simultaneous measurements within one day reduce errors below 10 ns.
Increasing from two to three observations improves timing precision by about a factor of two.
Diminishing returns occur when adding more than three observations for dispersion correction.
Abstract
Free electrons in the interstellar medium cause frequency-dependent delays in pulse arrival times due to both scattering and dispersion. Multi-frequency measurements are used to estimate and remove dispersion delays. In this paper, we focus on the effect of any non-simultaneity of multi-frequency observations on dispersive delay estimation and removal. Interstellar density variations combined with changes in the line-of-sight from pulsar and observer motions cause dispersion measure variations with an approximately power-law power spectrum, augmented in some cases by linear trends. We simulate time series, estimate the magnitude and statistical properties of timing errors that result from non-simultaneous observations, and derive prescriptions for data acquisition that are needed in order to achieve a specified timing precision. For nearby, highly stable pulsars, measurements need to be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
