Stacking of large interferometric data sets in the image- and uv-domain -- a comparative study
Lukas Lindroos, K. K. Knudsen, W. Vlemmings, J. Conway, and I., Mart\'i-Vidal

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new uv-domain stacking algorithm for radio interferometric data, demonstrating its robustness and improved signal-to-noise ratio over traditional image-stacking, especially for deep surveys and resolved sources.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel uv-stacking algorithm that enhances robustness and accuracy in radio interferometric data analysis, outperforming image-stacking in key metrics.
Findings
Uv-stacking is more robust than image-stacking.
Uv-stacking yields up to 20% higher signal-to-noise ratio.
Improves size estimates for resolved sources.
Abstract
We present a new algorithm for stacking radio interferometric data in the uv-domain. The performance of uv-stacking is compared to the stacking of fully imaged data using simulated Atacama Large Millimeter/sub-millimeter Array (ALMA) and the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array (VLA) deep extragalactic surveys. We find that image- and uv-stacking produce similar results, however, uv-stacking is typically the more robust method. An advantage of the uv-stacking algorithm is the availability of uv-data post stacking, which makes it possible to identify and remove problematic baselines. For deep VLA surveys uv-stacking yields a signal-to-noise ratio that is up to 20 per cent higher than image-stacking. Furthermore, we have investigated stacking of resolved sources with a simulated VLA data set where 1.5" (10-12 kpc at z ~ 1-4) sources are stacked. We find that uv-stacking, where a model is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
