The ring of polynomials integral-valued over a finite set of integral elements
G. Peruginelli

TL;DR
This paper generalizes McQuillan's result on the Pr"ufer property of integer-valued polynomial rings over finite sets, extending it to finitely generated torsion-free algebras over integrally closed domains and describing their integral closures.
Contribution
It extends the characterization of the integral closure and Pr"ufer property of integer-valued polynomial rings to more general algebraic settings involving finitely generated torsion-free algebras.
Findings
The integral closure of ${ m Int}_K(S,A)$ equals the contraction of ${ m Int}( ext{Omega}_S,D_F)$.
The integral closure of ${ m Int}_K(S,A)$ is Pr"ufer if and only if $D$ is Pr"ufer.
The integral closure of certain pullbacks is the ring of polynomials integral-valued over roots of a polynomial.
Abstract
Let be an integral domain with quotient field and a finite subset of . McQuillan proved that the ring of polynomials in which are integer-valued over , that is, such that , is a Pr\"ufer domain if and only if is Pr\"ufer. Under the further assumption that is integrally closed, we generalize his result by considering a finite set of a -algebra which is finitely generated and torsion-free as a -module, and the ring of integer-valued polynomials over , that is, polynomials over whose image over is contained in . We show that the integral closure of is equal to the contraction to of , for some finite subset of integral elements over contained in an algebraic closure of ,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
