Multiplexity and multireciprocity in directed multiplexes
Valerio Gemmetto, Tiziano Squartini, Francesco Picciolo, Franco, Ruzzenenti, Diego Garlaschelli

TL;DR
This paper introduces the concepts of multiplexity and multireciprocity in directed multiplex networks, analyzing their significance in the World Trade Multiplex and revealing how these properties relate to trade patterns among commodities.
Contribution
It defines multiplexity and multireciprocity matrices for directed multiplexes, validates their significance with null models, and applies them to empirical trade data to uncover underlying trade structures.
Findings
WTM shows strong multiplexity and multireciprocity, largely explained by node degrees.
Residual effects of multiplexity and multireciprocity are statistically significant.
Multireciprocity is lower than aggregate reciprocity, indicating group-based trade patterns.
Abstract
Real-world multi-layer networks feature nontrivial dependencies among links of different layers. Here we argue that, if links are directed, dependencies are twofold. Besides the ordinary tendency of links of different layers to align as the result of `multiplexity', there is also a tendency to anti-align as the result of what we call `multireciprocity', i.e. the fact that links in one layer can be reciprocated by \emph{opposite} links in a different layer. Multireciprocity generalizes the scalar definition of single-layer reciprocity to that of a square matrix involving all pairs of layers. We introduce multiplexity and multireciprocity matrices for both binary and weighted multiplexes and validate their statistical significance against maximum-entropy null models that filter out the effects of node heterogeneity. We then perform a detailed empirical analysis of the World Trade…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
