Evaluating the accuracy of diffusion MRI models in white matter

TL;DR

This study compares the accuracy of diffusion tensor and sparse fascicle models in white matter, showing SFM generally outperforms DTM, especially in complex fiber regions, improving fiber orientation estimation.

Contribution

First comprehensive evaluation of the model-accuracy of DTM and SFM in human white matter using cross-validation across different b-values.

Findings

SFM outperforms DTM in most white matter regions.

SFM provides more accurate fiber orientation estimates.

DTM accuracy is often below test-retest reliability.

Abstract

Models of diffusion MRI within a voxel are useful for making inferences about the properties of the tissue and inferring fiber orientation distribution used by tractography algorithms. A useful model must fit the data accurately. However, evaluations of model-accuracy of some of the models that are commonly used in analyzing human white matter have not been published before. Here, we evaluate model-accuracy of the two main classes of diffusion MRI models. The diffusion tensor model (DTM) summarizes diffusion as a 3-dimensional Gaussian distribution. Sparse fascicle models (SFM) summarize the signal as a linear sum of signals originating from a collection of fascicles oriented in different directions. We use cross-validation to assess model-accuracy at different gradient amplitudes (b-values) throughout the white matter. Specifically, we fit each model to all the white matter voxels in one data set and then use the model to predict a second, independent data set. This is the first evaluation of model-accuracy of these models. In most of the white matter the DTM predicts the data more accurately than test-retest reliability; SFM model-accuracy is higher than test-retest reliability and also higher than the DTM, particularly for measurements with (a) a b-value above 1000 in locations containing fiber crossings, and (b) in the regions of the brain surrounding the optic radiations. The SFM also has better parameter-validity: it more accurately estimates the fiber orientation distribution function (fODF) in each voxel, which is useful for fiber tracking.