The metaphysics of laws: dispositionalism vs. primitivism
Mauro Dorato, Michael Esfeld

TL;DR
This paper compares dispositionalism and primitivism regarding laws of nature, highlighting clearer distinctions in classical mechanics and advantages of dispositionalism in quantum mechanics and modern physics.
Contribution
It clarifies the distinction between the two views in classical mechanics and argues for dispositionalism's advantages in quantum and contemporary physics.
Findings
Clear distinction in classical mechanics
Dispositionalism has advantages in quantum mechanics
Dispositionalism better aligns with modern physics
Abstract
The paper compares dispositionalism about laws of nature with primitivism. It argues that while the distinction between these two positions can be drawn in a clear-cut manner in classical mechanics, it is less clear in quantum mechanics, due to quantum non-locality. Nonetheless, the paper points out advantages for dispositionalism in comparison to primitivism also in the area of quantum mechanics, and of contemporary physics in general.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
