The Burden of Risk Aversion in Mean-Risk Selfish Routing
E. Nikolova, N. Stier-Moses

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how risk-averse agents in network routing can cause inefficiency, quantifies this via the price of risk aversion, and finds that network structure influences the impact of risk preferences.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of the price of risk aversion, providing bounds and properties for general and series-parallel networks, and employs combinatorial proofs involving alternating paths.
Findings
PRA depends linearly on risk tolerance and variability.
In series-parallel networks, PRA is independent of network size.
Wardrop equilibria maximize shortest-path objectives in SP networks.
Abstract
Considering congestion games with uncertain delays, we compute the inefficiency introduced in network routing by risk-averse agents. At equilibrium, agents may select paths that do not minimize the expected latency so as to obtain lower variability. A social planner, who is likely to be more risk neutral than agents because it operates at a longer time-scale, quantifies social cost with the total expected delay along routes. From that perspective, agents may make suboptimal decisions that degrade long-term quality. We define the {\em price of risk aversion} (PRA) as the worst-case ratio of the social cost at a risk-averse Wardrop equilibrium to that where agents are risk-neutral. For networks with general delay functions and a single source-sink pair, we show that the PRA depends linearly on the agents' risk tolerance and on the degree of variability present in the network. In contrast…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
