Inverse Ising inference with correlated samples
Benedikt Obermayer, Erel Levine

TL;DR
This paper investigates how correlations between samples, such as those caused by phylogeny, affect inverse Ising inference and proposes methods to correct for these biases, improving the accuracy of inferred interactions.
Contribution
It introduces an analytical model and an exact method combining phylogenetic modeling with adaptive cluster expansion to address sample correlations in inverse Ising inference.
Findings
Popular reweighting schemes are only marginally effective
A rescaling strategy improves inference results
Conclusions extend to mean-field approaches
Abstract
Correlations between two variables of a high-dimensional system can be indicative of an underlying interaction, but can also result from indirect effects. Inverse Ising inference is a method to distinguish one from the other. Essentially, the parameters of the least constrained statistical model are learned from the observed correlations such that direct interactions can be separated from indirect correlations. Among many other applications, this approach has been helpful for protein structure prediction, because residues which interact in the 3D structure often show correlated substitutions in a multiple sequence alignment. In this context, samples used for inference are not independent but share an evolutionary history on a phylogenetic tree. Here, we discuss the effects of correlations between samples on global inference. Such correlations could arise due to phylogeny but also via…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
