High-energy gamma-ray and neutrino backgrounds from clusters of galaxies and radio constraints
Fabio Zandanel (1), Irene Tamborra (1), Stefano Gabici (2),, Shin'ichiro Ando (1) ((1) GRAPPA Institute, University of Amsterdam, (2) APC,, Univ. Paris Diderot)

TL;DR
This study estimates the contribution of galaxy clusters to the diffuse gamma-ray and neutrino backgrounds, concluding they are unlikely to be significant sources under current observational constraints.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive modeling of cluster contributions to gamma-ray and neutrino backgrounds, incorporating magnetic fields and radio constraints, and finds their impact is minimal.
Findings
Clusters contribute less than 10% to the gamma-ray background.
Neutrino flux from clusters can only match IceCube data with very hard spectra.
Proton-photon interactions in clusters are unlikely to produce high-energy neutrinos.
Abstract
Cosmic-ray protons accumulate for cosmological times in clusters of galaxies as their typical radiative and diffusive escape times are longer than the Hubble time. Their hadronic interactions with protons of the intra-cluster medium generate secondary electrons, gamma-rays and neutrinos. We here estimate the contribution from clusters to the diffuse gamma-ray and neutrino backgrounds. We model the cluster population by means of their mass function, using a phenomenological luminosity-mass relation applied to all clusters, as well as a detailed semi-analytical model. Additionally, we consider observationally-motivated values for the cluster magnetic field. This is a crucial parameter since the observed radio counts due to synchrotron emission by secondary electrons need to be respected. For a choice of parameters respecting all current constraints, and assuming a spectral index of -2, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
