Study of quasielastic scattering using charged-current nu_mu-iron interactions in the MINOS Near Detector
P. Adamson, I. Anghel, A. Aurisano, G. Barr, M. Bishai, A. Blake, G., J. Bock, D. Bogert, S. V. Cao, C. M. Castromonte, S. Childress, J. A. B., Coelho, L. Corwin, D. Cronin-Hennessy, J. K. de Jong, A. V. Devan, N. E., Devenish, M. V. Diwan, C. O. Escobar, J. J. Evans, E. Falk

TL;DR
This study analyzes quasielastic muon neutrino interactions with iron in the MINOS Near Detector, revealing deficiencies in existing models at low Q^2 and proposing a data-driven correction to improve the simulation of these interactions.
Contribution
It introduces a Q^2-dependent suppression function for baryon resonance production and measures the axial-vector mass M_A from experimental data.
Findings
Monte Carlo model inadequate at low Q^2
Inclusion of suppression function improves model fit
Measured axial-vector mass M_A = 1.23 GeV
Abstract
Kinematic distributions from an inclusive sample of 1.41 x 10^6 charged-current nu_mu interactions on iron, obtained using the MINOS Near Detector exposed to a wide-band beam with peak flux at 3 GeV, are compared to a conventional treatment of neutrino scattering within a Fermi gas nucleus. Results are used to guide the selection of a subsample enriched in quasielastic nu_mu Fe interactions, containing an estimated 123,000 quasielastic events of incident energies 1 < E_nu < 8 GeV, with <E_nu> = 2.79 GeV. Four additional subsamples representing topological and kinematic sideband regions to quasielastic scattering are also selected for the purpose of evaluating backgrounds. Comparisons using subsample distributions in four-momentum transfer Q^2 show the Monte Carlo model to be inadequate at low Q^2. Its shortcomings are remedied via inclusion of a Q^2-dependent suppression function for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
