Reproducible x-ray reflectometry optimization: statistical analysis of differential evolution fitting of multilayer structural models
Donald Windover, David Gil, Yasushi Azuma, Toshiyuki Fujimoto

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the reproducibility of X-ray reflectometry measurements and model fitting, providing best practices for consistent results across instruments and laboratories, based on extensive statistical analysis.
Contribution
It introduces concrete recommendations for reproducible XRR model fitting using common optimization methods, validated through bootstrap analysis.
Findings
Recommendations improve reproducibility of XRR results
Validated methods work across different instruments
Provides practical guidelines for research and industry
Abstract
We test the reproducibility of X-ray reflectometry(XRR) measurements and optimizations using an National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ)/National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) pre-standard. Based on bootstrap analysis of repeated refinements, using several CPU-years of time, we provide concrete recommendations of best practices for ensuring the reproducibility of XRR model fitting results. These recommendations can be used to study both instrument repeatability and cross-instrument reproducibility. Because the recommendations used optimizations methods available in commonly used commercial software, they can quickly be applied both in research and analytical laboratories, as well as fabrication environments.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsX-ray Diffraction in Crystallography · Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis · Soil and Unsaturated Flow
