Knowing "where the photons have been"
Karol Bartkiewicz, Anton\'in \v{C}ernoch, Dalibor Jav\r{u}rek, Karel, Lemr, Jan Soubusta, Ji\v{r}\'i Svozil\'ik

TL;DR
This paper offers a clear, intuitive explanation of a complex quantum optics experiment, demonstrating that the observed results align with classical physics and proposing a more reliable method to determine photon paths.
Contribution
It introduces a simple one-state vector formalism for interpreting nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer experiments and proposes a more reliable which-path witness.
Findings
The formalism agrees with classical physics models.
The new which-path witness provides consistent results.
The experiment's seemingly counter-intuitive results are explained logically.
Abstract
Linear-optical interferometers play a key role in designing circuits for quantum information processing and quantum communications. Even though nested Mach-Zehnder interferometers appear easy to describe, there are occasions when they provide unintuitive results. This paper explains the results of a highly discussed experiment performed by Danan et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 240402 (2013)] using a standard approach. We provide a simple and intuitive one-state vector formalism capable of interpreting their experiment. Additionally, we cross-checked our model with a classical-physics based approach and found that both models are in complete agreement. We argue that the quantity used in the mentioned experiment is not a suitable which-path witness producing seemingly contra-intuitive results. To circumvent this issue, we establish a more reliable which-path witness and show that it yields…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
