The Erd\H{o}s-Selfridge and the Schinzel-Tijdeman theorems hold in $PA^-$
Victor Pambuccian

TL;DR
This paper proves that certain number theory theorems, including the non-existence of powers among products of consecutive integers and results on polynomial solutions, hold within a weak logical framework called $PA^-$, which lacks induction.
Contribution
It demonstrates that key theorems in number theory remain valid in a weak, non-inductive fragment of Peano Arithmetic, expanding understanding of their logical strength.
Findings
The product of consecutive integers is never a perfect power.
Schinzel and Tijdeman's results on polynomial solutions hold in $PA^-$.
These theorems are valid without induction in discretely ordered rings.
Abstract
We show that "The product of consecutive integers is never a power" and several results by Schinzel and Tijdeman on the solutions of the equation , for , , and a polynomial with rational coefficients and with at least two distinct zeros, hold in a weak fragment of Peano Arithmetic, , which lacks any kind of induction, and whose models are the positive cones of discretely ordered rings.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems · Analytic Number Theory Research · History and Theory of Mathematics
