Partial Wave Analysis of the Reaction $p(3.5 GeV)+p \to pK^+\Lambda$ to Search for the "$ppK^-$" Bound State
G. Agakishiev, O. Arnold, D. Belver, A. Belyaev, J.C. Berger-Chen, A., Blanco, M. B\"ohmer, J. L. Boyard, P. Cabanelas, S. Chernenko, A. Dybczak, E., Epple, L. Fabbietti, O. Fateev, P. Finocchiaro, P. Fonte, J. Friese, I., Fr\"ohlich, T. Galatyuk, J. A. Garz\'on, R. Gernh\"auser

TL;DR
This study used partial wave analysis to investigate the $pK^+\Lambda$ reaction at 3.5 GeV, finding no evidence for the hypothesized $ppK^-$ bound state and setting upper limits on its production cross-section.
Contribution
It applies a comprehensive partial wave analysis to search for the $ppK^-$ bound state in proton-proton collisions, providing the first quantitative upper limits on its contribution.
Findings
No significant $ppK^-$ signal detected.
Upper limit for $ppK^-$ contribution is 2-12% of total cross section.
Production cross-section of $ppK^-$ is constrained between 0.7 and 4.2 microbarns.
Abstract
Employing the Bonn-Gatchina partial wave analysis framework (PWA), we have analyzed HADES data of the reaction . This reaction might contain information about the kaonic cluster "" via its decay into . Due to interference effects in our coherent description of the data, a hypothetical (or, specifically "") cluster signal must not necessarily show up as a pronounced feature (e.g. a peak) in an invariant mass spectra like . Our PWA analysis includes a variety of resonant and non-resonant intermediate states and delivers a good description of our data (various angular distributions and two-hadron invariant mass spectra) without a contribution of a cluster. At a confidence level of CL=95\% such a cluster can not contribute more than 2-12\% to the total cross section with a …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
