Fine's theorem, noncontextuality, and correlations in Specker's scenario
Ravi Kunjwal

TL;DR
This paper characterizes noncontextual models within Fine's theorem, explores their limitations, and derives inequalities for Specker's scenario, clarifying the relationship between different notions of noncontextuality in quantum theory.
Contribution
It provides a detailed characterization of noncontextual models within Fine's theorem and derives new noncontextuality inequalities for Specker's scenario.
Findings
Equivalent conditions for noncontextual models are established.
Derived three noncontextuality inequalities for Specker's scenario.
Characterized the correlation polytope under no-disturbance conditions.
Abstract
A characterization of noncontextual models which fall within the ambit of Fine's theorem is provided. In particular, the equivalence between the existence of three notions is made explicit: a joint probability distribution over the outcomes of all the measurements considered, a measurement-noncontextual and outcome-deterministic (or KS-noncontextual, where 'KS' stands for 'Kochen-Specker') model for these measurements, and a measurement-noncontextual and factorizable model for them. A KS-inequality, therefore, is implied by each of these three notions. Following this characterization of noncontextual models that fall within the ambit of Fine's theorem, non-factorizable noncontextual models which lie outside the domain of Fine's theorem are considered. While outcome determinism for projective (sharp) measurements in quantum theory can be shown to follow from the assumption of preparation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
