Optimal designs for comparing curves
Holger Dette, Kirsten Schorning

TL;DR
This paper develops optimal design strategies for comparing two regression curves, significantly reducing confidence band width and improving the accuracy of dose response relationship comparisons.
Contribution
It introduces a novel optimal design framework for comparing two regression curves, including explicit solutions for common dose response models.
Findings
Optimal designs reduce confidence band width by over 50%.
Explicit solutions are provided for standard dose response models.
Optimal comparison designs differ from individual model optimal designs.
Abstract
We consider the optimal design problem for a comparison of two regression curves, which is used to establish the similarity between the dose response relationships of two groups. An optimal pair of designs minimizes the width of the confidence band for the difference between the two regression functions. Optimal design theory (equivalence theorems, efficiency bounds) is developed for this non standard design problem and for some commonly used dose response models optimal designs are found explicitly. The results are illustrated in several examples modeling dose response relationships. It is demonstrated that the optimal pair of designs for the comparison of the regression curves is not the pair of the optimal designs for the individual models. In particular it is shown that the use of the optimal designs proposed in this paper instead of commonly used "non-optimal" designs yields a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
