Are GRB Blackbodies an Artifact of Spectral Evolution?
J. Michael Burgess, Felix Ryde

TL;DR
This study investigates whether blackbody components in GRB spectra are genuine or artifacts caused by spectral evolution, finding that time-integrated analyses can falsely suggest blackbody presence, while time-resolved analysis confirms their physical reality.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates through simulations that spectral evolution can produce false blackbody signals in time-integrated spectra, emphasizing the importance of time-resolved analysis for accurate GRB spectral interpretation.
Findings
Time-integrated spectra can falsely indicate blackbody components due to spectral curvature.
Time-resolved analysis reduces false blackbody detections, confirming their physical existence.
Artificial blackbody parameters do not mimic observed spectral evolution patterns.
Abstract
The analysis of gamma-ray burst (GRB) spectra with multi-component emission models has become an important part of the field. In particular, multi-component analysis where one component is a blackbody representing emission from a photosphere has enabled both a more detailed understanding of the energy content of the jet as well as the ability to examine the dynamic structure of the outflow. While the existence of a blackbody-like component has been shown to be significant and not a byproduct of background fluctuations, it is very possible that it can be an artifact of spectral evolution of a single component that is being poorly resolved in time. Herein, this possibility is tested by simulating a single component evolving in time and then folding the spectra through the detector response to generate time-tagged event Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) data. We then fit both the time…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
