Understanding the Unique Assembly History of Central Group Galaxies

TL;DR

This study investigates the unique assembly and evolution of central galaxies in massive halos, revealing that late-time accretion of outer components significantly influences their size and structure compared to non-central galaxies.

Contribution

It provides new insights into the distinct dynamical scaling relations of central galaxies at z~0.6, highlighting the role of late accretion in their evolution.

Findings

Central galaxies have larger sizes at fixed velocity dispersion compared to non-CGs.

Extended outer components can increase galaxy size and mass estimates by factors of ~2.

Late-time accretion and satellite stripping are key to CG evolution.

Abstract

Central Galaxies (CGs) in massive halos live in unique environments with formation histories closely linked to that of the host halo. In local clusters they have larger sizes ($R_e$) and lower velocity dispersions (sigma) at fixed stellar mass M_star, and much larger R_e at a fixed $\sigma$ than field and satellite galaxies (non-CGs). Using spectroscopic observations of group galaxies selected from the COSMOS survey, we compare the dynamical scaling relations of early-type CGs and non-CGs at z~0.6, to distinguish possible mechanisms that produce the required evolution. CGs are systematically offset towards larger R_e at fixed $\sigma$ compared to non-CGs with similar M_star. The CG R_e-M_star relation also shows differences, primarily driven by a sub-population (~15%) of galaxies with large $R_e$, while the M_star-sigma relations are indistinguishable. These results are accentuated when double Sersic profiles, which better fit light in the outer regions of galaxies, are adopted. They suggest that even group-scale CGs can develop extended components by these redshifts that can increase total $R_e$ and M_star estimates by factors of ~2. To probe the evolutionary link between our sample and cluster CGs, we also analyze two cluster samples at z~0.6 and z~0. We find similar results for the more massive halos at comparable z, but much more distinct CG scaling relations at low-z. Thus, the rapid, late-time accretion of outer components, perhaps via the stripping and accretion of satellites, would appear to be a key feature that distinguishes the evolutionary history of CGs.