The Gaia-ESO Survey: {\alpha}-abundances of metal-poor stars
R. Jackson-Jones, P. Jofr\'e, K. Hawkins, A. Hourihane, G. Gilmore, G., Kordopatis, C. Worley, S. Randich, A. Vallenari, T. Bensby, A. Bragaglia, E., Flaccomio, A. J. Korn, A. Recio-Blanco, R. Smiljanic, M. T. Costado, U., Heiter, V. Hill, C. Lardo, P. de Laverny, G. Guiglion

TL;DR
This study analyzes the ratio of low-{ extalpha} to high-{ extalpha} stars in the Galactic halo using Gaia-ESO data, revealing insights into star formation environments and their distribution.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed measurement of the low-{ extalpha} to high-{ extalpha} star ratio in the Galactic halo with no systematic trends observed.
Findings
The low-{ extalpha} to high-{ extalpha} ratio is approximately 0.28.
About 15% of metal-poor stars formed in low star formation rate environments.
The ratio shows no significant variation with metallicity or Galactic position.
Abstract
We performed a detailed study of the ratio of low-{\alpha} to high-{\alpha} stars in the Galactic halo as observed by the Gaia-ESO Survey. Using a sample of 381 metal-poor stars from the second internal data release, we found that the value of this ratio did not show evidence of systematic trends as a function of metallicity, surface gravity, Galactic latitude, Galactic longitude, height above the Galactic plane, and Galactocentric radius. We conclude that the {\alpha}-poor/{\alpha}-rich value of 0.28 0.08 suggests that in the inner halo, the larger portion of stars were formed in a high star formation rate environment, and about 15% of the metal-poor stars originated from much lower star formation rate environments.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
