Performance testing of lead free primers: blast waves, velocity variations, and environmental testing

TL;DR

This study compares lead-free DDNP primers with traditional lead styphnate primers through various tests, revealing that DDNP primers currently lack the reliability needed for practical service use.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive performance evaluation of DDNP-based primers, including blast wave consistency and environmental robustness, highlighting their limitations compared to lead-based primers.

Findings

DDNP primers show higher shot-to-shot blast wave variation.

Environmental conditions significantly affect primer performance.

DDNP primers are less reliable for service use.

Abstract

Results are presented for lead free primers based on diazodinitrophenol (DDNP)compared with tests on lead styphnate based primers. First, barrel friction measurements in 5.56 mm NATO are presented. Second, shot to shot variations in blast waves are presented as determined by detonating primers in a 7.62x51mm rifle chamber with a firing pin, but without any powder or bullet loaded and measuring the blast wave at the muzzle with a high speed pressure transducer. Third, variations in primer blast waves, muzzle velocities, and ignition delay are presented after environmental conditioning (150 days) for two lead based and two DDNP based primers under cold and dry (-25 deg C,0% relative humidity), ambient (20 deg C, 50% relative humidity), and hot & humid (50 deg C, 100% relative humidity) conditions in 5.56 mm NATO. Taken together, these results indicate that DDNP based primers are not sufficiently reliable for service use.