Sample of optically unidentified X-ray binaries in the Galactic bulge. Constraints on the physical nature from infrared photometric surveys
Ivan Zolotukhin (1, 2), Mikhail Revnivtsev (3) ((1) CNRS, IRAP,, Toulouse, France, (2) Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow, Russia, (3), IKI, Moscow, Russia)

TL;DR
This study uses infrared surveys to identify and analyze the nature of seven persistent X-ray sources in the Galactic bulge, revealing insights into their accretion mechanisms and classifying a subset as wind-fed low-mass X-ray binaries.
Contribution
It provides new infrared observations and constraints on the physical nature of previously unidentified X-ray binaries in the Galactic bulge, including evidence for wind-fed accretion.
Findings
Identified or constrained flux limits for 7 X-ray sources.
Suggested IGR J17597-2201 is a wind-fed low-mass X-ray binary.
Probed the properties of systems at luminosities of 10^{34-35} erg s^{-1}.
Abstract
We report on the archival near-infrared and mid-infrared observations of 7 persistent X-ray sources situated in the Galactic bulge using data from the UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey (UKIDSS), Spitzer Galactic Legacy Infrared Mid-Plane Survey Extraordinaire (GLIMPSE) and the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) all-sky survey. We were able to successfully identify, or provide upper flux limits for the systems SAX J1747.0-2853, IGR J17464-2811, AX J1754.2-2754, IGR J17597-2201, IGR J18134-1636, IGR J18256-1035, Ser X-1 and constrain the nature of these systems. In the case of IGR J17597-2201 we present arguments that the source accretes matter from the stellar wind rather than via Roche lobe overflow of the secondary. We suggest that, at its X-ray luminosity of erg s, we are probing the poorly known class of wind-fed low-mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
