The G+M eclipsing binary V530 Orionis: A stringent test of magnetic stellar evolution models for low-mass stars
G. Torres (1), C. H. Sandberg Lacy (2), K. Pavlovski (3), G. A. Feiden, (4), J. A. Sabby (5), H. Bruntt (6), and J. V. Clausen (7) ((1) CfA, (2), Univ. of Arkansas, (3) Univ. of Zagreb, (4) Uppsala Univ., (5) Southern, Illinois Univ., (6) Aarhus Univ., (7) Niels Bohr Inst.)

TL;DR
This study uses detailed observations of the V530 Ori binary system to test and validate magnetic stellar evolution models for low-mass stars, addressing longstanding discrepancies in stellar radius and temperature predictions.
Contribution
It provides precise measurements of stellar parameters and demonstrates that magnetic models can accurately reproduce observed properties of low-mass stars.
Findings
Standard models underpredict radius and overpredict temperature of the secondary.
Magnetic models from Dartmouth match observations at 3 Gyr with realistic magnetic field strengths.
Observations suggest magnetic fields have a small effect on the primary star's properties.
Abstract
We report extensive photometric and spectroscopic observations of the 6.1-day period, G+M-type detached double-lined eclipsing binary V530 Ori, an important new benchmark system for testing stellar evolution models for low-mass stars. We determine accurate masses and radii for the components with errors of 0.7% and 1.3%, as follows: M(A) = 1.0038 +/- 0.0066 M(sun), M(B) = 0.5955 +/- 0.0022 M(sun), R(A) = 0.980 +/- 0.013 R(sun), and R(B) = 0.5873 +/- 0.0067 R(sun). The effective temperatures are 5890 +/- 100 K (G1V) and 3880 +/- 120 K (M1V), respectively. A detailed chemical analysis probing more than 20 elements in the primary spectrum shows the system to have a slightly subsolar abundance, with [Fe/H] = -0.12 +/- 0.08. A comparison with theory reveals that standard models underpredict the radius and overpredict the temperature of the secondary, as has been found previously for other M…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
