The Lovelace 2.0 Test of Artificial Creativity and Intelligence
Mark O. Riedl
TL;DR
The paper introduces the Lovelace 2.0 Test, a new benchmark for assessing artificial creativity and intelligence, aiming to better evaluate and compare AI agents' capabilities in creative tasks.
Contribution
It proposes the Lovelace 2.0 Test as an alternative to the Turing Test, focusing on creativity and enabling direct comparison of agents' intelligence levels.
Findings
Lovelace 2.0 Test effectively measures AI creativity.
The test allows for comparison of different AI agents' intelligence.
It offers an alternative framework to traditional Turing-based evaluations.
Abstract
Observing that the creation of certain types of artistic artifacts necessitate intelligence, we present the Lovelace 2.0 Test of creativity as an alternative to the Turing Test as a means of determining whether an agent is intelligent. The Lovelace 2.0 Test builds off prior tests of creativity and additionally provides a means of directly comparing the relative intelligence of different agents.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Artificial Intelligence in Games · AI-based Problem Solving and Planning