Holographic bounds and finite inflation
Daniel Phillips, Andrew Scacco, and Andreas Albrecht

TL;DR
This paper compares two holographic approaches to bounding the amount of cosmic inflation, finding they produce similar bounds but differ in details when applied to specific cosmologies.
Contribution
It analyzes and contrasts two holographic bounds on inflation, highlighting their similarities and differences through application to various cosmological models.
Findings
Both approaches yield the same bound on e-foldings.
Differences arise when applying the models to specific cosmologies.
Implementation of these bounds can be complex in practice.
Abstract
We compare two holographic arguments that impose especially strong bounds on the amount of inflation. One comes from the de Sitter Equilibrium cosmology and the other from the work of Banks and Fischler. We find that simple versions of these two approaches yield the same bound on the number of e-foldings. A careful examination reveals that while these pictures are similar in spirit, they are not necessarily identical prescriptions. We apply the two pictures to specific cosmologies which expose potentially important differences and which also demonstrate ways these seemingly simple proposals can be tricky to implement in practice.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
