On the Influence of Graph Density on Randomized Gossiping
Robert Els\"asser, Dominik Kaaser

TL;DR
This paper investigates how graph density affects the efficiency of randomized gossiping protocols, revealing that sparse graphs perform similarly to complete graphs, and proposes parameter tuning to reduce communication overhead.
Contribution
The study provides an analytical and empirical comparison of gossiping performance across different graph densities, highlighting minimal impact of sparsity and introducing optimized algorithm parameters.
Findings
Sparse graphs perform similarly to complete graphs in gossiping efficiency.
Tuning algorithm parameters can significantly reduce communication overhead.
No substantial difference in gossiping performance between dense and sparse graphs.
Abstract
Information dissemination is a fundamental problem in parallel and distributed computing. In its simplest variant, the broadcasting problem, a message has to be spread among all nodes of a graph. A prominent communication protocol for this problem is based on the random phone call model (Karp et al., FOCS 2000). In each step, every node opens a communication channel to a randomly chosen neighbor for bi-directional communication. Motivated by replicated databases and peer-to-peer networks, Berenbrink et al., ICALP 2010, considered the gossiping problem in the random phone call model. There, each node starts with its own message and all messages have to be disseminated to all nodes in the network. They showed that any -time algorithm in complete graphs requires message transmissions per node to complete gossiping, w.h.p, while for broadcasting the average…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOpportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks · Distributed systems and fault tolerance · Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
