Yielding and flow in aggregated particulate suspensions
Peter J. Scales, Shane P. Usher, Maria Barmar Larsen, Anthony D., Stickland, Hui-En Teo, Ross G. de Kretser, Richard Buscall

TL;DR
This paper tests a simple constitutive model for cohesive particulate gels' compressional strength, highlighting the importance of wall adhesion and elastic-plastic duality in understanding gel consolidation.
Contribution
It introduces a combined elastic and wall debonding model to better describe the consolidation behavior of cohesive particulate gels.
Findings
Wall adhesion significantly affects gel consolidation.
Elastic-plastic duality arises from concentration-dependent modulus.
A simple combined model can approximate consolidation equilibrium.
Abstract
A simple and popular constitutive model used to describe the compressional strength of a consolidating strongly cohesive particulate gel is tested further with new experimental data. Strong cohesive particulate gels have variously been described as being ratchet (poro) elastic, on the one hand, and as having a yield stress in compression, on the other, to the point where same groups of workers have used both descriptions at one time or another. The dichotomy is real though as such gels do show a hitherto somewhat puzzling elastic-plastic duality. This can be explained in part by the strong concentration dependence of the modulus since this leads to irreversible volumetric strain-hardening, in effect, the ratchet; but only in small part. The real problem seems to be that, until very recently, most work on consolidation has neglected what what Michaels and Bolger told us to do over 50…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGranular flow and fluidized beds · Geotechnical and construction materials studies
