Comparison of Atmospheric Parameters Determined from Spectroscopy and Photometry for DA White Dwarfs in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
C. Genest-Beaulieu, P. Bergeron

TL;DR
This study compares atmospheric parameters of DA white dwarfs derived from spectroscopy and photometry in SDSS, revealing calibration issues and systematic differences, and proposes methods to improve parameter estimation accuracy.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of photometric and spectroscopic techniques for determining white dwarf parameters, highlighting calibration challenges and correction methods.
Findings
Photometric data are well calibrated with zeropoint corrections.
Spectroscopic analysis benefits from 3D hydrodynamical corrections.
Systematic temperature offsets exist between photometric and spectroscopic methods.
Abstract
We present a comparative analysis of atmospheric parameters obtained with the so-called photometric and spectroscopic techniques. Photometric and spectroscopic data for 1360 DA white dwarfs from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) are used, as well as spectroscopic data from the Villanova White Dwarf Catalog. We first test the calibration of the ugriz photometric system by using model atmosphere fits to observed data. Our photometric analysis indicates that the ugriz photometry appears well calibrated when the SDSS to AB_95 zeropoint corrections are applied. The spectroscopic analysis of the same data set reveals that the so-called high-log g problem can be solved by applying published correction functions that take into account 3D hydrodynamical effects. However, a comparison between the SDSS and the White Dwarf Catalog spectra also suggests that the SDSS spectra still suffer from a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
