Decidability of predicate logics with team semantics
Juha Kontinen, Antti Kuusisto, Jonni Virtema

TL;DR
This paper investigates the computational complexity of various predicate logics with team semantics, establishing NEXPTIME-completeness for some and undecidability for others, thus advancing understanding of their decidability boundaries.
Contribution
It proves NEXPTIME-completeness for satisfiability of two-variable independence and inclusion logic, and undecidability for validity in two-variable dependence logic, solving open problems.
Findings
Satisfiability of two-variable independence logic is NEXPTIME-complete.
Satisfiability of two-variable inclusion logic is NEXPTIME-complete.
Validity of two-variable dependence logic is undecidable.
Abstract
We study the complexity of predicate logics based on team semantics. We show that the satisfiability problems of two-variable independence logic and inclusion logic are both NEXPTIME-complete. Furthermore, we show that the validity problem of two-variable dependence logic is undecidable, thereby solving an open problem from the team semantics literature. We also briefly analyse the complexity of the Bernays-Sch\"onfinkel-Ramsey prefix classes of dependence logic.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
