Evolvability signatures of generative encodings: beyond standard performance benchmarks
Danesh Tarapore, Jean-Baptiste Mouret

TL;DR
This paper introduces 'evolvability signatures' to evaluate the adaptive potential of different encoding schemes in evolutionary robotics, providing insights beyond traditional fitness benchmarks.
Contribution
It proposes a new metric called evolvability signatures to assess how different genetic encodings influence a robot's ability to adapt and recover from damages.
Findings
SUPG encoding showed the best evolvability signature.
Evolvability signatures predicted adaptation speed.
SUPG outperformed other encodings in damage recovery.
Abstract
Evolutionary robotics is a promising approach to autonomously synthesize machines with abilities that resemble those of animals, but the field suffers from a lack of strong foundations. In particular, evolutionary systems are currently assessed solely by the fitness score their evolved artifacts can achieve for a specific task, whereas such fitness-based comparisons provide limited insights about how the same system would evaluate on different tasks, and its adaptive capabilities to respond to changes in fitness (e.g., from damages to the machine, or in new situations). To counter these limitations, we introduce the concept of "evolvability signatures", which picture the post-mutation statistical distribution of both behavior diversity (how different are the robot behaviors after a mutation?) and fitness values (how different is the fitness after a mutation?). We tested the relevance of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEvolutionary Algorithms and Applications · Reinforcement Learning in Robotics · Robotic Locomotion and Control
